Authors:
Ankit Gupta, Srishti Agarwal
Download free PDF
Onshore Wind Turbine Market Size & Share 2026-2035
Report ID: GMI12007
|
Published Date: August 2026
|
Report Format: PDF/Excel/Dashboard/Platform
Download Free PDF
Explore Our Licensing Options:
Download Free PDF
Onshore Wind Turbine Market
Get a free sample of this report
Get a free sample of this report Onshore Wind Turbine Market
Is your requirement urgent? Please give us your business email
for a speedy delivery!

Onshore Wind Turbine Market Size
The Onshore Wind Turbine Market was valued at USD 146.3 billion in 2025, the onshore wind turbine market will reach USD 225.9 billion by 2035 at a 4.4% CAGR over 2026-2035, according to the latest report published by Global Market Insights Inc.
Onshore Wind Turbine Market Key Takeaways
Market Leader: Vestas led with over 17% market share in 2025.
Leading Players: Top 5 players in this market include Vestas, Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy, Goldwind, Envision Energy, GE Vernova, which collectively held a market share of 53% in 2025.
Revenue represents capital expenditure deployed per MW of global onshore capacity installed. The 2025 base year remains preliminary: 106,000 MW of installations may vary by ±5-8% when full statistical publication is completed. The market includes HAWT and VAWT installations above 500 kW, grid-connected and stand-alone projects, new build, repowering, turbine supply, civil works, installation, commissioning, and balance-of-plant infrastructure. Offshore turbines, small wind below 500 kW, O&M and aftermarket services, land leases, permitting costs, resource assessment, and engineering consulting are excluded.
The forecast contains a material structural distinction: installed volume rises at a 5.0% CAGR while revenue grows at 4.4%. Total installed cost per MW declines from USD 1.38 million in 2025 to USD 1.31 million in 2035 as larger platforms reduce equipment, civil, and grid costs per unit of output. The consequence is that deployment activity grows faster than the revenue pool. This distinction applies across every regional and segment forecast rather than representing a temporary pricing anomaly. [1]Global Wind Energy Council, "Global Wind Report 2024," gwec.net
The 2022-2025 record shows a post-pandemic construction surge followed by normalization. Global installations reached 106,800 MW and revenue reached USD 152,100 million in 2023, then contracted to 100,000 MW and USD 139,800 million in 2024 as China normalized, European supply chains tightened, and Siemens Gamesa paused sales of its 4.X platform for quality remediation. The 2025 recovery to 106,000 MW and USD 146,300 million reflects construction activity linked to the U.S. Inflation Reduction Act, REPowerEU, India’s interstate transmission projects, and a more stable Chinese policy environment. [2]International Energy Agency, "Renewables 2024," iea.org
The estimates use a demand-side, bottom-up framework: annual MW additions are valued at validated total installed cost per MW by pricing region, then triangulated against GWEC, IEA, national statistics, policy pipelines, company reporting, and public installation data. Regional totals reconcile to the global market in 2025 and 2035. Segment allocations reconcile within each segmentation axis, subject only to displayed rounding in the component forecast table.
GMI Analyst View
The market moves into a volume-led expansion phase through 2030, then shifts toward a mix of greenfield construction and repowering through 2035. Larger turbines lower project-level cost, but they also reduce installed-cost intensity per MW, leaving revenue growth below installation growth. The commercial issue is not whether wind deployment rises, but where pricing discipline holds as Chinese suppliers widen international participation. Repowering becomes the principal stabilizer in mature markets after 2030 because grid connections, access roads, and site permissions already exist.
Key Drivers
Renewable targets underpin the largest demand contribution. China’s Five-Year Plans, India’s 500 GW renewable goal, REPowerEU, and U.S. tax incentives create multi-year project pipelines rather than isolated procurement cycles. India installed 6-7 GW in FY2024 against a 25 GW annual pace implied by its 2030 target, leaving a measurable catch-up requirement. [3]Ministry of New and Renewable Energy, "Renewable Energy Programme," mnre.gov.in
Onshore wind retains a cost position that supports new-build economics. IRENA places global onshore wind LCOE within USD 0.024-0.107/kWh, with much new capacity in the USD 0.033-0.050/kWh range. Larger rotor diameters and higher hub heights improve yield while reducing the number of machines, foundations, and grid interfaces needed for a capacity target. [4]International Renewable Energy Agency, "Renewable Power Generation Costs in 2023," irena.org
Energy-security policy has turned permitting and domestic capacity into commercial variables. REPowerEU and the EU permitting framework support faster renewable buildout, while U.S. production and investment tax credits improve project economics. Repowering extends this effect because existing sites can use established infrastructure and interconnection rights.
Key Restraints
Rare-earth dependence, specialty steel availability, blade transport, and component logistics constrain the rate at which larger platforms can scale. Neodymium and dysprosium exposure remains tied to Chinese supply chains, while blades exceeding 80 m require specialized production, storage, transport, and installation capability.
Permitting and interconnection create a separate capacity bottleneck. Germany installed 3.0 GW in 2024 against a 10 GW annual pace required for its 2030 trajectory, and U.S. interconnection queues exceed 2,000 GW across technologies. Projects can remain commercially viable while still failing to convert into installations on schedule.
Falling installed cost per MW benefits developers and electricity consumers, but it restrains market revenue. Global installed cost moves from USD 1.38 million/MW in 2025 to USD 1.31 million/MW in 2035. That pricing pattern explains why the volume forecast remains above the revenue forecast throughout the period.
GMI Analyst View
Policy support and cost competitiveness outweigh the identified restraints, but neither removes execution risk. The most consequential constraint is the conversion of project pipelines into grid-connected assets. Price pressure raises the importance of service revenue, financing support, and local manufacturing for OEMs. By 2030, suppliers that combine larger platforms with bankable service commitments will retain stronger positions than suppliers competing only on turbine price.
Onshore Wind Turbine Market Segment Analysis
By Axis of Rotation
Horizontal-axis wind turbines remain the utility-scale standard because drivetrain, rotor, tower, crane, and grid-integration supply chains were developed around HAWT architecture. Vestas EnVentus, Siemens Gamesa 4.X/5.X, GE Vernova’s 3.6-154 and 6.1-158, and Nordex Delta4000 platforms demonstrate the depth of this installed base. HAWTs grow with the market, although their share declines as specialized applications expand.
VAWTs operate in complex terrain, turbulent wind regimes, urban-fringe sites, and hybrid remote systems where omnidirectionality and lower cut-in requirements matter. Their 8.5% CAGR is a niche-growth rate from USD 3,700 million rather than a challenge to utility-scale HAWT leadership. By 2035, VAWTs still account for only 3.7% of revenue.
By Connectivity
Grid-connected projects dominate because auctions, PPAs, feed-in mechanisms, tax credits, and renewable portfolio standards are designed around utility-scale generation. U.S. IRA-supported projects, German additions under its onshore target, and Indian ISTS-linked projects concentrate capital in this segment. Grid-connected share rises to 96.0% in 2035.
Stand-alone systems support remote communities, military installations, islands, and industrial microgrids. Saudi remote industrial zones, African rural programs, and wind-battery systems in archipelago markets support demand, yet grid extension and utility-scale economics limit the segment to 2.1% growth. The segment’s operating value lies in resilience and access rather than volume.
By Power Rating
Turbines above 3 MW account for the largest and fastest-growing rating class. Vestas V172-7.2MW, Nordex N177-7.X, Siemens Gamesa SG 5.X, and CSSC Haizhuang’s H242-12.5MW fit the procurement direction toward greater output from each foundation and grid connection. SANY’s 15 MW prototype and Windey’s 11.5 MW certified turbine show the upper end of that trajectory. [5]Vestas, "Annual Report 2024," vestas.com
The >1-3 MW range remains relevant where roads, cranes, grid limits, and site geometry constrain turbine size. The >500 kW-1 MW class contracts as utility-scale procurement shifts to larger machines. Residual demand remains tied to remote, industrial, and distributed applications.
By Component
The displayed 2035 component total differs from the global total by USD 100 million because component figures are rounded. Nacelles retain the largest share because they contain the drivetrain, generator, converter, transformer, controls, yaw system, and monitoring equipment. Gearbox-coupled DFIG and permanent-magnet direct-drive architectures keep engineering complexity concentrated in the nacelle.
Towers become more demanding as hub heights rise beyond 130 m, while transport constraints sustain regional manufacturing. Rotor modules require advanced composite molds, leading-edge protection, specialized transport, and controlled storage. CRRC’s blade operations and GE Vernova subsidiary LM Wind Power illustrate vertical integration in rotor supply. [6]CRRC Wind Power, "Wind Power Products," crrcgc.cc
GMI Analyst View
Power-rating migration drives the market more than changes in axis or component mix. Every large-platform deployment increases the value of logistics, grid studies, and service execution, even as it reduces equipment intensity per MW. The >3 MW class will control 78% of revenue by 2035 because it aligns with both greenfield economics and repowering needs. VAWT growth remains commercially relevant in constrained applications, not as a replacement for HAWTs.
Onshore Wind Turbine Market Regional Analysis
North America
North America reaches USD 27,900 million by 2035, expanding at 7.6%. The U.S. IRA production and investment tax credits support an 8-14 GW annual construction range through 2030, with Texas, Iowa, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, and Wyoming remaining key wind states. Canada adds demand through Ontario and Alberta. Repowering of legacy fleets gives GE Vernova and Vestas a second channel for growth beyond greenfield projects.
Europe
Europe rises from USD 25,400 million to USD 46,800 million. Germany’s 100 GW onshore target, Spain’s 62 GW PNIEC target, the UK’s CfD framework, and French and Italian development pipelines support the 6.3% CAGR. Germany’s 3.0 GW installation level in 2024 remained below the pace needed for 2030, confirming that permits and grid connections remain central constraints. European installed cost declines from USD 1.64 million/MW in 2025 to USD 1.56 million/MW in 2035.
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific remains the largest market at USD 100,100 million in 2025, equal to 68.4% of global revenue. China represents 65% of Asia Pacific revenue and installations, placing 44% of global onshore wind revenue in a single country. That concentration makes Chinese policy, trade conditions for rare earths and specialty steel, and private-developer regulation material forecast risks.
China’s 14th and 15th Five-Year Plans support a 70-80 GW annual onshore addition trajectory. India’s 500 GW renewable target requires 25 GW of annual wind additions by 2030, compared with 6-7 GW in FY2024. Australia’s Capacity Investment Scheme, Japan’s Tohoku and Hokkaido markets, and South Korea’s Jeolla provinces add regional breadth. Asia Pacific revenue declines from USD 136,000 million in 2034 to USD 133,100 million in 2035 under the base case as China crosses a Five-Year Plan transition; global growth continues because Europe and the Americas add volume. [7]National Development and Reform Commission, "China Fourteenth Five-Year Plan Energy Chapter," ndrc.gov.cn
Latin America
Latin America reaches USD 8,700 million by 2035 at a 4.7% CAGR. Brazil’s Ceará, Rio Grande do Norte, Bahia, and Piauí markets lead regional demand. Mexico’s private PPA market and Argentina’s Patagonia projects provide additional procurement channels. Competition in the region turns on financing, local execution, and service coverage as Chinese and European OEMs pursue the same projects.
Middle East and Africa
Middle East and Africa grows from USD 1,812 million to USD 9,290 million at a 17.8% CAGR. This rate reflects a small starting base of 1.2% of global revenue, not a comparable growth scale to large regional markets. The USD 7.5 billion absolute gain across the forecast is lower than a typical annual Asia Pacific addition. Every use of the MEA CAGR requires this tiny-base context.
Saudi Arabia’s National Renewable Energy Program, the UAE Clean Energy Strategy, Oman’s program, South Africa’s REIPPP auctions, Egypt’s Suez Canal Wind Corridor, Morocco’s projects, and Kenyan and Ethiopian grid programs underpin regional opportunity. Saudi Arabia, Egypt, South Africa, and Morocco are the principal country anchors.
GMI Analyst View
Regional diversification is underway, but it does not eliminate China-centered risk. Asia Pacific remains the largest demand pool through 2035, while North America and Europe create the strongest developed-market growth rates. Middle East and Africa becomes strategically important for OEM order books and export manufacturing, although its 17.8% CAGR should never be separated from its USD 1,812 million base. By 2030, local-content rules and project financing will increasingly determine regional winners.
Onshore Wind Turbine Market Share & Competitive Landscape
Vestas leads the market with 17% of 2025 revenue, followed by Siemens Gamesa Renewable Energy at 11%, Goldwind at 10%, Envision at 8%, and GE Vernova at 7%. The top five hold 53%, making the market moderately concentrated by revenue. Chinese OEMs command a larger share of installed MW than revenue because Asia Pacific total installed costs of USD 1.31 million/MW sit below Europe’s USD 1.64 million/MW. Shares are revenue-based on the USD 146,300 million global total.
Vestas combines international reach, EnVentus platforms, service revenue, and repowering capability. Siemens Gamesa retains a broad European and service footprint while restoring its 4.X and 5.X platform position. Goldwind’s direct-drive technology, manufacturing scale, and developer role support global leadership by installed MW. Envision combines turbines with the EnOS digital platform and international project execution. GE Vernova benefits from its North American installed base, LM Wind Power integration, and IRA-supported pipeline. [8]Siemens Energy, "Annual Report FY2024," siemens-energy.com [9]Goldwind, "2024 Annual Results," goldwind.com
The next competitive tier includes Mingyang, CSSC Haizhuang, Windey, Dongfang, United Power, SANY, Shanghai Electric, and CRRC. CSSC’s H242-12.5MW platform targets large desert and Gobi bases. Windey’s medium-voltage DFIG positioning and WD230-11500 certification support its technology angle. SANY combines Indian orders with plans for European manufacturing, while CRRC’s blade capability strengthens supply-chain control. ENERCON and Nordex remain European onshore specialists with differentiated regional service and platform positions. Suzlon and Inox Wind represent India’s domestic supply base; Inox Wind replaced Hitachi Energy in the approved company universe because it is an Indian onshore turbine OEM. Doosan Enerbility remains a Korea-focused onshore legacy profile built around the WinDS3000, with its forward strategy centered on offshore platforms. Senvion is a historical profile only: it became defunct in 2019, and Siemens Gamesa acquired its European service assets, IP, and Ria Blades in 2020. Sinovel retains a diminished market role.
GMI Analyst View
The revenue market is moderately concentrated, yet competitive intensity remains high because regional pricing and supplier access differ sharply. Western leaders retain advantages in service, financing, and high-compliance markets. Chinese OEMs are most likely to gain where developers value turnkey pricing and domestic-content partnerships. The second-order effect of international expansion is a shift from equipment competition to competition over project risk allocation, long-term availability, and financing support.
Recent Industry Developments
Need a specific section of this report?
Purchase regional analysis, country-level analysis, company profiles, or any other segment-level insights separately
based on your research needs.
Research methodology, data sources & validation process
This report draws on a structured research process built around direct industry conversations, proprietary modelling, and rigorous cross-validation and not just desk research.
Our 6-step research process
1. Research design & analyst oversight
At GMI, our research methodology is built on a foundation of human expertise, rigorous validation, and complete transparency. Every insight, trend analysis, and forecast in our reports is developed by experienced analysts who understand the nuances of your market.
Our approach integrates extensive primary research through direct engagement with industry participants and experts, complemented by comprehensive secondary research from verified global sources. We apply quantified impact analysis to deliver dependable forecasts, while maintaining complete traceability from original data sources to final insights.
2. Primary research
Primary research forms the backbone of our methodology, contributing nearly 80% to overall insights. It involves direct engagement with industry participants to ensure accuracy and depth in analysis. Our structured interview program covers regional and global markets, with inputs from C-suite executives, directors, and subject matter experts. These interactions provide strategic, operational, and technical perspectives, enabling well-rounded insights and reliable market forecasts.
3. Data mining & market analysis
Data mining is a key part of our research process, contributing nearly 20% to the overall methodology. It involves analysing market structure, identifying industry trends, and assessing macroeconomic factors through revenue share analysis of major players. Relevant data is collected from both paid and unpaid sources to build a reliable database. This information is then integrated to support primary research and market sizing, with validation from key stakeholders such as distributors, manufacturers, and associations.
4. Market sizing
Our market sizing is built on a bottom-up approach, starting with company revenue data gathered directly through primary interviews, alongside production volume figures from manufacturers and installation or deployment statistics. These inputs are then pieced together across regional markets to arrive at a global estimate that stays grounded in actual industry activity.
5. Forecast model & key assumptions
Every forecast includes explicit documentation of:
✓ Key growth drivers and their assumed impact
✓ Restraining factors and mitigation scenarios
✓ Regulatory assumptions and policy change risk
✓ Technology adoption curve parameter
✓ Macroeconomic assumptions (GDP growth, inflation, currency)
✓ Competitive dynamics and market entry/exit expectations
6. Validation & quality assurance
The final stages involve human validation, where domain experts manually review filtered data to identify nuances and contextual errors that automated systems might miss. This expert review adds a critical layer of quality assurance, ensuring data aligns with research objectives and domain-specific standards.
Our triple-layer validation process ensures maximum data reliability:
✓ Statistical Validation
✓ Expert Validation
✓ Market Reality Check
Trust & credibility
Verified data sources
Trade publications
Industry journals, trade publications, and specialized media.
Industry databases
Proprietary and third-party market databases
Regulatory filings
Government procurement records and policy documents
Academic research
University studies and specialist institution reports
Company reports
Annual reports, investor presentations, and filings
Expert interviews
C-suite, procurement leads, and technical specialists
GMI archive
13,000+ published studies across 20+ industry verticals
Trade data
Import/export volumes, HS codes, and customs records
Parameters studied & evaluated
Every data point in this report is validated through primary interviews, true bottom-up modelling, and rigorous cross-checks. Read about our research process →