Download free PDF

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Size & Share 2026-2035

Report ID: GMI9655
   |
Published Date: September 2026
 | 
Report Format: PDF/Excel/Dashboard/Platform

Download Free PDF

Explore Our Licensing Options:

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Size

The power plant emission control systems market was valued at USD 2.92 billion in 2025 and will reach USD 2.94 billion by 2035 and an overall 7% CAGR across 2026–2035, according to the latest report published by Global Market Insights Inc.

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Key Takeaways

2025 Market Size
$ 2.92 Billion
2026 Market Size
$ 2.93 Billion
2035 Forecast Market Size
$ 2.94 Billion
CAGR (2026–2035)
7%
Regional Dominance
Largest Market
Asia Pacific
Fastest Growing Region
Middle East & Africa
Key Players
  • Market Leader: Fujian Longking led with over 10% market share in 2025.

  • Leading Players: Top 5 players in this market include Fujian Longking, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, GE Vernova, Doosan Enerbility, Thermax, which collectively held a market share of 31% in 2025.

The addressable market covers revenue from new-installation systems for particulate, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, acid-gas, mercury, and related flue-gas controls at coal-fired, gas-fired, biomass, and waste-to-energy plants.It excludes retrofit, aftermarket, service, and broader industrial air-pollution-control revenue. The market is best understood as a commissioning-cycle market rather than a steady-growth equipment category: South and Southeast Asian thermal projects create a concentrated near-term order window, while renewable substitution limits the long-run new-build base.

The estimate applies a demand-side view of equipment and integrated-system procurement at new power projects. Market sizing triangulates the active thermal commissioning pipeline, system scope by plant type, and regional regulatory requirements that make emission control equipment a permitting prerequisite. The annual revenue pattern is materially uneven. Revenue fell from USD 4.05 billion in 2022 to USD 2.43 billion in 2024 as new coal commissioning outside China slowed and financing conditions tightened, then recovered to USD 2.92 billion in 2025. Global Energy Monitor identifies India and Indonesia as the principal locations of coal capacity under construction after China’s pipeline weakened.

The expansion phase runs through 2028, when the market reaches USD 4.63 billion at a 16.6% growth-phase CAGR. India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE account for much of the commissioning activity supporting that upswing. New thermal projects in these markets require particulate, SO₂, and NOx control within the plant’s original capital scope. The later decline is equally important: revenues fall to USD 2.94 billion by 2035 at a −6.3% CAGR as the construction pipeline is completed, China reduces new coal activity, and renewable-plus-storage alternatives absorb a larger share of incremental generation investment. Clean-energy investment has outpaced thermal investment globally, narrowing the future pool of new projects that require these systems.

Electrostatic precipitators (ESPs) account for approximately 30% of 2025 revenue, while catalytic systems and absorbers each account for approximately 25%. Scrubbers and other technologies form the remaining share. Coal plants still define the market’s volume cycle, but gas-fired combined-cycle gas turbine (CCGT), biomass co-firing, and waste-to-energy (W2E) projects provide a smaller and more resilient source of technically demanding system demand. Asia Pacific contributes approximately 60% of 2025 revenue, while Middle East & Africa gains share over the study period.

GMI Analyst View

The market’s near-zero long-term CAGR conceals a sharp allocation problem for OEMs. The 2025–2028 peak rewards capacity, local execution, and tender access in India and Southeast Asia; it does not indicate a durable global expansion cycle. After 2028, the strategic question shifts from capturing coal-linked volume to protecting margin through gas, W2E, and biomass applications. The second-order effect is a change in competitive criteria: equipment suppliers with only scale face lower utilization after the commissioning peak, while suppliers with multi-pollutant configurations can pursue smaller but more complex projects through 2035.

Key Drivers

Driver Approx. CAGR Impact Impact Timeline
New thermal plant commissioning in South and Southeast Asia +3.2% Asia Pacific volume concentrated in India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Vietnam Short term (≤2 years)
Mandatory emission compliance at new installations +2.8% Emerging-market permitting and finance requirements, led by MEA and Latin America Medium term (2–4 years)
W2E and biomass co-firing plant expansion +1.5% Higher-value multi-pollutant packages in Europe and Asia Pacific Medium term (2–4 years)
Gas-fired CCGT additions +1.2% SCR and absorber demand in the Middle East and North America Short term (≤2 years)

New thermal plant commissioning in South and Southeast Asia is the central near-term driver. India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Vietnam retain active coal, gas, and biomass commissioning pipelines, and system orders are placed alongside boiler, turbine, and balance-of-plant packages. India’s revised requirements require new coal units to incorporate SO₂, NOx, and particulate controls before operation. Indonesia’s Government Regulation No. 22/2021 likewise supports a compliance-led procurement model for new coal capacity.

Mandatory environmental compliance at newly permitted plants broadens demand beyond the traditional China-centered coal market. In the Middle East, Africa, and Latin America, permit requirements and project-finance environmental, health, and safety conditions increasingly make full emission-control scope non-discretionary.[2] World Bank benchmarks place these systems at 8–12% of total capital expenditure for new coal projects in emerging markets, compared with approximately 5–7% a decade earlier.[3] The procurement consequence is clear: compliance equipment moves from a discretionary engineering choice to a core release condition for project financing and commissioning.

W2E and biomass co-firing add a differentiated equipment opportunity. These applications need combinations of fabric filters, activated carbon injection, wet scrubbers, and mercury-control technologies because municipal solid waste and biomass produce more variable flue-gas chemistry than conventional coal. Europe, Japan, South Korea, and Southeast Asia therefore create demand for higher-value multi-pollutant scopes even as coal volume weakens. Gas-fired CCGT additions in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and the United States add a separate demand stream for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and absorber systems. Gas-related applications represent approximately 16% of 2025 market revenue and reduce, but do not eliminate, coal-cycle exposure.

Key Restraints

Restraint Approx. CAGR Impact Impact Timeline
Renewable-energy cost deflation displacing new thermal capacity −3.5% Global; strongest after active thermal pipelines are completed Long term (≥4 years)
Coal financing moratoriums and lender exclusions −2.1% Global project-finance constraint, acute in concessional-finance markets Medium term (2–4 years)
China volume dependency and new-coal pipeline contraction −1.8% Asia Pacific concentration risk centered on China Long term (≥4 years)

Renewable cost deflation is the market’s principal structural restraint. Solar, wind, and battery storage compete directly with new thermal capacity in markets that historically generated equipment orders. The effect becomes stronger after the current construction pipeline is exhausted, which explains the projected decline after 2028 rather than a smooth continuation of the growth phase. Global investment trends reinforce this direction: clean-energy capital now exceeds investment in thermal generation.

Coal financing restrictions create a second constraint by limiting project viability before equipment procurement begins. Multilateral development banks, export credit agencies, and commercial lenders have reduced or excluded new coal financing. The impact is strongest in markets where concessional funding is essential to advance a project, including parts of Sub-Saharan Africa and lower-income South Asia. A delayed financial close translates into deferred boiler, turbine, and emission-control orders.

China concentration adds a third risk. China contributes approximately USD 1.23 billion, or approximately 42%, of 2025 global revenue. Its pre-construction coal pipeline has fallen to its lowest level since 2014, creating a large downside exposure that cannot be fully offset by growth in smaller emerging markets. China’s shift also pressures domestic suppliers to seek export volume, intensifying price competition in India, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and African tenders.

GMI Analyst View

Compliance requirements protect demand at projects that reach construction, but they cannot create projects where financing and economics no longer support thermal generation. This distinction separates the market’s immediate order strength from its longer-term contraction. Through 2028, regulation raises system content per commissioned unit. From 2029 onward, renewable substitution and lender policy reduce the number of eligible units, making the project pipeline more decisive than further tightening of emissions standards.

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Segment Analysis

By System

ESPs lead the market at approximately USD 0.88 billion in 2025 and reach approximately USD 1.39 billion in 2028. They charge particulate matter in flue-gas streams and collect it on grounded plates, making them the preferred particulate-control solution for large coal units in price-sensitive Asian markets. China’s Ultra-Low Emission policy requires particulate matter at or below 5 mg/Nm³, reinforcing the value of high-performance configurations. The segment follows the coal commissioning cycle most closely. Fujian Longking and Zhejiang Feida benefit from manufacturing scale and domestic Chinese references, while GE Vernova, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, KC Cottrell India, and Monroe Environmental compete on pulse energization, high-frequency power supplies, and stringent performance requirements. ESP demand peaks with Asian coal activity, then returns to approximately USD 0.88 billion by 2035. The segment’s scale remains attractive, but its long-run risk is the highest among the principal technologies.

power-plant-emission-control-systems-market-revenue-share-by-systems-2024-2032

Catalytic systems account for approximately USD 0.73 billion in 2025, rise to approximately USD 1.16 billion in 2028, and moderate to approximately USD 0.74 billion by 2035. SCR and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR) control NOx through ammonia or urea chemistry; SCR provides 80–95% removal efficiency, while SNCR offers a lower-capital-cost option where standards allow higher residual emissions. Tightening NOx requirements in India, Indonesia, and the Middle East turn these systems into a standard specification for new plants. Gas-fired CCGT plants give catalytic systems a more durable base than coal-dependent equipment. Fuel Tech, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, GE Vernova, ANDRITZ, and Doosan Enerbility address this segment with SCR, SNCR, and integrated system offerings. MHI’s catalyst formulations and compact modules support high-specification projects, while GE Vernova can include NOx controls within broader gas-plant supply packages. The gas opportunity will not replace coal volume, but it stabilizes demand beyond the peak.

Absorbers also account for approximately USD 0.73 billion in 2025, peak at approximately USD 1.16 billion in 2028, and decline to approximately USD 0.74 billion by 2035. Wet flue-gas desulfurization (FGD), dry FGD, and spray-dryer absorber configurations control SO₂ and acid gases. Wet limestone FGD achieves 95–99% removal and produces gypsum that can offset lifecycle costs in high-volume applications. Dry and semi-dry systems are better suited to water-constrained locations, including the Middle East and northern India. India’s 200 mg/Nm³ SO₂ requirement for new large coal installations and Indonesia’s amended PLTU requirements sustain absorber procurement during the growth phase. Babcock & Wilcox, Clyde Bergemann, ANDRITZ, Doosan Enerbility/Doosan Lentjes, and GEA compete through wet, dry, and circulating-fluidized-bed solutions.[4]

Scrubbers represent approximately USD 0.35 billion in 2025, peak at approximately USD 0.56 billion in 2028, and return to approximately USD 0.35 billion by 2035. Wet ESPs, Venturi scrubbers, ionizing wet scrubbers, and multi-pollutant configurations have a larger role in W2E and biomass plants because these facilities require control of acid gases, fine particulates, heavy metals, and dioxins. That chemistry creates higher engineering complexity than conventional coal particulate control. CECO Environmental, GEA, Monroe Environmental, Dürr CTS, Ducon Technologies, and TAPC address this specialized segment. EU Industrial Emissions Directive requirements and stringent Japanese limits place a premium on performance guarantees rather than lowest-cost hardware. Scrubber demand therefore provides a partial margin buffer after 2028, although its smaller revenue base prevents it from changing the overall market direction.

The others category includes baghouses, activated carbon injection, ceramic filters, and hybrid multi-pollutant systems. It represents approximately USD 0.23 billion in 2025, peaks at approximately USD 0.37 billion in 2028, and moderates to approximately USD 0.24 billion by 2035. These technologies serve biomass co-firing, refuse-derived fuel combustion, and power-plant boiler applications where PM2.5, mercury, or dioxin limits exceed the capability of conventional ESP and wet FGD configurations. Airnord, APC Technologies, Clyde Bergemann, Sumitomo Heavy Industries, and Ducon Technologies extend coverage in these narrower applications. More stringent PM2.5 standards in Japan, South Korea, and the EU support specification upgrades at W2E and biomass sites.

GMI Analyst View

Technology mix will become more valuable than segment scale after 2028. ESP and absorber suppliers capture the bulk of near-term volume, yet catalytic, scrubber, and hybrid systems gain relative strategic importance because gas, W2E, and biomass projects remain viable in more jurisdictions. The winning portfolios will connect scale equipment with higher-specification controls rather than treating them as separate businesses. This transition raises the value of integrated system design and project references in complex applications.

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Regional Analysis

North America

North America accounts for approximately USD 0.29 billion, or 10%, of 2025 revenue. The United States contributes approximately USD 0.23 billion and grows at approximately 1.0% CAGR through 2035, supported by new gas-fired CCGT and peaker plants rather than coal construction. U.S. EPA New Source Performance Standards Subpart TTTT and state permitting conditions make SCR or combustion-control NOx systems mandatory at new combustion facilities. GE Vernova, Fuel Tech, Babcock & Wilcox, Monroe Environmental, and CECO Environmental have regulatory and manufacturing familiarity in this market. Canada adds biomass and selected gas demand, while Mexico contributes modest gas-fired project activity.

Europe

Europe represents approximately USD 0.23 billion, or 8%, of 2025 revenue. New coal construction is largely absent, so W2E, biomass co-firing, and limited gas peaker projects define the addressable market. Germany contributes approximately USD 0.06 billion in 2025, while the UK, France, Spain, and Italy add smaller volumes. EU Industrial Emissions Directive and waste-incineration requirements create demanding technical specifications for new W2E plants. ANDRITZ, GEA, Doosan Lentjes, Dürr CTS, Airnord, and Sumitomo Heavy Industries are positioned in this higher-value, lower-volume environment.

Asia Pacific

Asia Pacific leads at approximately USD 1.75 billion in 2025 and reaches approximately USD 2.73 billion in 2028 before declining to approximately USD 1.62 billion in 2035. China accounts for approximately USD 1.23 billion in 2025, but its −1.5% CAGR reflects a declining coal pipeline. Its stringent PM, SO₂, and NOx limits preserve system value per project even as commissioning numbers fall. India contributes approximately USD 0.18 billion and grows at approximately 2.5% CAGR, supported by the thermal pipeline and MoEFCC requirements. Indonesia and Vietnam provide coal-commissioning demand, while Japan and South Korea sustain lower-volume W2E and biomass work.

asia-pacific-power-plant-emission-control-systems-market-2024-2032

Fujian Longking, Zhejiang Feida, Thermax, KC Cottrell India, Doosan Enerbility, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, and Sumitomo Heavy Industries compete across the region. Localization requirements in India and Indonesia favor domestic manufacturing or partnership structures and limit the advantage of purely import-led bids.

Middle East & Africa

Middle East & Africa rises from approximately USD 0.35 billion and 12% of global revenue in 2025 to approximately USD 0.44 billion and 15% by 2035, after a USD 0.60 billion peak in 2028. Saudi Arabia and the UAE drive gas-fired capacity additions under Vision 2030 and related industrial-expansion programs, creating SCR and absorber demand. W2E projects add demand for scrubbers and fabric filters. South Africa provides a separate thermal opportunity where project-finance conditions require conformity with IFC environmental, health, and safety guidance.

Latin America

Latin America contributes approximately USD 0.29 billion in 2025, peaks at approximately USD 0.46 billion in 2028, and returns to approximately USD 0.29 billion by 2035. Brazil leads demand through gas peaker and CCGT projects that manage seasonal hydro variability, with Argentina contributing secondary volume. CONAMA permitting frameworks sustain NOx-control and absorber demand at qualifying new installations. Renewable expansion remains the region’s principal long-term restraint, creating a short commissioning window rather than a durable expansion cycle.

GMI Analyst View

Regional divergence is more important than the global average. Asia Pacific supplies scale but carries China concentration and price pressure; North America offers steady gas-linked work; Europe offers demanding W2E specifications; and MEA provides the strongest relative share trajectory. Through 2030, OEMs that balance Asian volume with Gulf gas and European W2E references will have the best protection against the post-peak decline. Localization capability is likely to determine tender access in India and Indonesia, while integration capability will matter more in W2E markets.

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Share & Competitive Landscape

The market remains fragmented. Fujian Longking leads with an estimated 8–10% share in 2025, followed by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries at 5–7%, GE Vernova at 4–6%, Doosan Enerbility at 3–5%, and Thermax at 3–4%. The top five hold an estimated 24–31%, leaving 59–71% distributed among regional specialists, project contractors, and technology-focused suppliers. No supplier has sufficient global share to set pricing across the market.

Longking’s strength rests on Chinese ESP scale, state-utility relationships, and an integrated design-manufacture-install-service model. Its challenge is geographic concentration as China’s new coal pipeline contracts. MHI competes through SCR catalysts and integrated SCR-FGD-ESP platforms for specifications-led projects. GE Vernova leverages its gas-power supply position by embedding emission controls in broader CCGT packages. Doosan Enerbility and Doosan Lentjes combine Asian coal and European W2E/biomass execution. Thermax holds a strong domestic Indian position across ESP, FGD, and SCR/SNCR systems, aligned with local compliance requirements.

The next tier includes Babcock & Wilcox, CECO Environmental, Zhejiang Feida, Fuel Tech, ANDRITZ, GEA, KC Cottrell India, Sumitomo Heavy Industries, and the remaining specialists. Major players operating in the market are APC Technologies; Airnord; ANDRITZ; Babcock & Wilcox; CECO Environmental; Clyde Bergemann; Doosan Enerbility/Doosan Lentjes; Ducon Technologies; Dürr CTS; Fuel Tech; Fujian Longking; GEA; GE Vernova; KC Cottrell India; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries; Monroe Environmental; Sumitomo Heavy Industries; TAPC; Thermax; and Zhejiang Feida.[5]

Babcock & Wilcox provides broad ESP, FGD, SCR/SNCR, and fabric-filter scope across power, W2E, and industrial combustion applications. Its SEC filings identify environmental systems as a core business area and disclosed new project awards in South Asia and the Middle East during 2025. CECO focuses on scrubber, filtration, and emissions-control offerings in North America and the Middle East. Fuel Tech remains a NOx-control specialist with SCR and SNCR applications for gas, coal, biomass, and W2E units.[6] Zhejiang Feida is positioned similarly to Longking in Chinese particulate control and is expanding internationally.[7]

Competition will intensify as Chinese suppliers seek export opportunities and larger diversified OEMs pursue W2E, gas, and emerging-market projects. The likely consolidation path is not a single global roll-up. It is selective acquisition or partnership activity that adds gas, W2E, localized manufacturing, or multi-pollutant engineering capability to coal-exposed portfolios.[8]

GMI Analyst View

The market favors differentiated fragmentation rather than broad consolidation in the near term. Large suppliers can bundle systems and finance complex delivery, but regional specialists retain advantages in local permitting, fabrication, and EPC relationships. As coal-linked volume contracts after 2028, the more consequential competitive shift will be toward portfolios that combine local execution with gas and W2E credentials. Suppliers dependent on a single geography or a single particulate-control technology face the greatest pressure to diversify.

Recent Industry Developments

  • Jun 2025: The International Energy Agency published *World Energy Investment 2025*, noting that clean-energy investment exceeded USD 2 trillion while thermal investment remained concentrated in India and Indonesia. The finding reinforces the market’s split between near-term Asian orders and long-term renewable substitution.
  • May 2025: Global Energy Monitor reported that China’s pre-construction coal pipeline had reached its lowest level since 2014, while India and Indonesia remained the principal locations of coal capacity under construction. The development sharpens the case for geographic diversification.[1]
  • Apr 2025: Thermax commissioned integrated ESP and wet-FGD systems for a new 1,320 MW ultra-supercritical coal plant in India. The project demonstrates the continuing role of full-system domestic suppliers in India’s compliance pipeline.
  • Mar 2025: Babcock & Wilcox disclosed new emission-control contracts for power projects in the Middle East and South Asia. The awards confirm active tender conversion in the two regions most relevant to the current recovery.

Power Plant Emission Control Systems Market Research Report

Need a specific section of this report?

Purchase regional analysis, country-level analysis, company profiles, or any other segment-level insights separately
based on your research needs.

Authors:  Ankit Gupta, Shashank Sisodia
Frequently Asked Question(FAQ) :
How big is the power plant emission control systems market?
The power plant emission control systems market size was estimated at USD 2.92 billion in 2025 and is expected to reach USD 2.93 billion in 2026.
What is the 2035 forecast for the power plant emission control systems market?
The market is projected to reach USD 2.94 billion by 2035, growing at a CAGR of 0.07% from 2026 to 2035.
Which region dominates the power plant emission control systems market?
Asia Pacific currently holds the largest share of the power plant emission control systems market in 2025.
Which region is expected to grow the fastest in the power plant emission control systems market?
Middle East & Africa is projected to be the fastest-growing region during the forecast period.
Who are the major players in power plant emission control systems market?
Some of the major players in power plant emission control systems market include Fujian Longking, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, GE Vernova, Doosan Enerbility, Thermax.

Research methodology, data sources & validation process

This report draws on a structured research process built around direct industry conversations, proprietary modelling, and rigorous cross-validation and not just desk research.

Our 6-step research process

  1. 1. Research design & analyst oversight

    At GMI, our research methodology is built on a foundation of human expertise, rigorous validation, and complete transparency. Every insight, trend analysis, and forecast in our reports is developed by experienced analysts who understand the nuances of your market.

    Our approach integrates extensive primary research through direct engagement with industry participants and experts, complemented by comprehensive secondary research from verified global sources. We apply quantified impact analysis to deliver dependable forecasts, while maintaining complete traceability from original data sources to final insights.

  2. 2. Primary research

    Primary research forms the backbone of our methodology, contributing nearly 80% to overall insights. It involves direct engagement with industry participants to ensure accuracy and depth in analysis. Our structured interview program covers regional and global markets, with inputs from C-suite executives, directors, and subject matter experts. These interactions provide strategic, operational, and technical perspectives, enabling well-rounded insights and reliable market forecasts.

  3. 3. Data mining & market analysis

    Data mining is a key part of our research process, contributing nearly 20% to the overall methodology. It involves analysing market structure, identifying industry trends, and assessing macroeconomic factors through revenue share analysis of major players. Relevant data is collected from both paid and unpaid sources to build a reliable database. This information is then integrated to support primary research and market sizing, with validation from key stakeholders such as distributors, manufacturers, and associations.

  4. 4. Market sizing

    Our market sizing is built on a bottom-up approach, starting with company revenue data gathered directly through primary interviews, alongside production volume figures from manufacturers and installation or deployment statistics. These inputs are then pieced together across regional markets to arrive at a global estimate that stays grounded in actual industry activity.

  5. 5. Forecast model & key assumptions

    Every forecast includes explicit documentation of:

    • ✓ Key growth drivers and their assumed impact

    • ✓ Restraining factors and mitigation scenarios

    • ✓ Regulatory assumptions and policy change risk

    • ✓ Technology adoption curve parameter

    • ✓ Macroeconomic assumptions (GDP growth, inflation, currency)

    • ✓ Competitive dynamics and market entry/exit expectations

  6. 6. Validation & quality assurance

    The final stages involve human validation, where domain experts manually review filtered data to identify nuances and contextual errors that automated systems might miss. This expert review adds a critical layer of quality assurance, ensuring data aligns with research objectives and domain-specific standards.

    Our triple-layer validation process ensures maximum data reliability:

    • ✓ Statistical Validation

    • ✓ Expert Validation

    • ✓ Market Reality Check

Trust & credibility

10+
Years in Service
Consistent delivery since establishment
A+
BBB Accreditation
Professional standards & satisfaction
ISO
Certified Quality
ISO 9001-2015 Certified Company
150+
Research Analysts
Across 20+ industry verticals
95%
Client Retention
5-year relationship value

Verified data sources

  • Trade publications

    Industry journals, trade publications, and specialized media.

  • Industry databases

    Proprietary and third-party market databases

  • Regulatory filings

    Government procurement records and policy documents

  • Academic research

    University studies and specialist institution reports

  • Company reports

    Annual reports, investor presentations, and filings

  • Expert interviews

    C-suite, procurement leads, and technical specialists

  • GMI archive

    13,000+ published studies across 20+ industry verticals

  • Trade data

    Import/export volumes, HS codes, and customs records

Parameters studied & evaluated

Every data point in this report is validated through primary interviews, true bottom-up modelling, and rigorous cross-checks. Read about our research process →

Authors:  Ankit Gupta, Shashank Sisodia

Download Free PDF

We use cookies to enhance user experience. (Privacy Policy)