Authors:
Monali Tayade, Sampada Kulkarni
Download free PDF
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Size & Share 2026-2035
Report ID: GMI1965
|
Published Date: September 2026
|
Report Format: PDF/Excel/Dashboard/Platform
Download Free PDF
Explore Our Licensing Options:
Download Free PDF
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market
Get a free sample of this reportWhat are you hoping to find?
Your PDF is on its way. Tell us little about your research goal, and we'll help you find the most relevant market insights.

Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Size
The cardiac prosthetic devices market was valued at USD 14.6 billion in 2025 and is forecast to grow at a 5.6% CAGR from 2026 to 2035; the approved forecast implies an approximately USD 25.2 billion market by 2035.
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Key Takeaways
Market Leader: Medtronic led with over 28% market share in 2025.
Leading Players: Top 5 players in this market include Abbott, Boston Scientific, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, BIOTRONIK, which collectively held a market share of 72% in 2025.
Growth is not simply a function of cardiovascular prevalence. It reflects the conversion of patients from surveillance or high-risk surgery pathways into catheter-based valve intervention, alongside a replacement and new-implant cycle in cardiac rhythm management.
Prosthetic heart valves account for the larger value pool, at approximately USD 8,740 million in 2025, versus approximately USD 5,900 million for pacemakers. The difference reflects the premium economics and expanding indications of transcatheter aortic and mitral valve systems. Pacemaker demand is steadier, but the mix is changing: leadless systems and conduction-system pacing offer an avenue to defend revenue and clinical differentiation as conventional transvenous pacing faces mature-market price pressure.
The market’s clinical backdrop remains substantial. Cardiovascular diseases caused an estimated 19.8 million deaths in 2022, and more than three-quarters of these deaths occurred in low- and middle-income countries. [1]World Health Organization - Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), June 11, 2024 - who.int) That burden does not translate automatically into device revenue: diagnosis, specialist capacity, hybrid laboratories, reimbursement, and device affordability determine how much need becomes implant volume. Aging increases the relevance of those constraints because calcific valve disease and bradyarrhythmias become more prevalent in older cohorts; the global population aged 65 years and older was about 833.5 million in 2024. [2]Measured World / United Nations Population Division - Population aged 65 years and over, 2024 - measuredworld.com
North America generated USD 6,311.95 million in 2025, followed by Europe at USD 3,940.82 million and Asia Pacific at USD 3,066.12 million. Asia Pacific has the highest approved forecast CAGR, at 6.86%, compared with 5.01% in North America and 5.35% in Europe. The regional spread is commercially important: North America remains the principal premium-reimbursement market, whereas Asia Pacific is where wider hospital access, domestic suppliers, and lower-price market models will determine incremental volume.
GMI Analyst View
The approved trajectory reflects a change in the economic boundary of treatment, rather than a uniform uplift across all cardiac implants. In valves, earlier intervention and catheter-based delivery can convert patients formerly managed through surveillance or high-risk surgery pathways into treated cohorts; the commercial return depends on whether reimbursement, imaging capacity, and heart-team throughput expand alongside indications. Pacemakers follow a different path: their established implant base sustains demand, while leadless and physiologic pacing reshape the mix through workflow, complication, and long-horizon device-management considerations. Consequently, the move from USD 12,816.63 million in 2022 to USD 14,639.79 million in 2025, and toward approximately USD 25,200 million by 2035 at a 5.64% CAGR, favors suppliers able to monetize premium structural-heart evidence without neglecting the service and pricing requirements of a more competitive pacing market.
Key Drivers
Indication expansion in transcatheter valve therapy.
In May 2025, the FDA approved Edwards’ SAPIEN 3 family for patients with asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis, supported by the EARLY TAVR study. [3]Edwards Lifesciences - Edwards TAVR Receives FDA Approval for Patients With Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis, May 1, 2025 - ir.edwards.com The approval matters because it moves part of the eligible population from watchful waiting toward active intervention. For heart teams, that increases the value of screening, imaging capacity, and follow-up pathways; for manufacturers, clinical-evidence programs can expand the addressable market without a new implant platform.
Aging, diagnostic capacity, and lower procedural burden.
The demographic increase in older adults enlarges the pool at risk of valvular and conduction disease, but demand accelerates only where referral and intervention are practical. Transfemoral TAVI has made valve replacement feasible for patients who would otherwise face prohibitive surgical risk. In a 10-year Spanish registry analysis, later TAVI cohorts had lower procedural mortality than earlier cohorts as techniques and care pathways matured. Better outcomes and shorter inpatient pathways improve hospital willingness to build procedural capacity, particularly at experienced structural-heart centers.
Technology changes in valves and pacing.
Retrievable transcatheter valves, improved sealing, tissue-treatment technologies, and miniaturized generators all address procedure or durability constraints. MicroPort CardioFlow’s VitaFlow Liberty received EU approval in May 2024, widening the commercial set of retrievable TAVI options in Europe. In pacing, Abbott’s AVEIR DR enables leadless dual-chamber pacing, while MicroPort’s Alizea and Celea approval introduced systems designed for long longevity in a compact form factor. These advances make device selection more dependent on workflow, future reintervention options, and remote follow-up capabilities than on basic implant availability alone.
Expansion of specialist delivery settings.
Hospitals remain central to complex valve replacement because they provide hybrid laboratories, surgery backup, and intensive care. Yet standardized pacemaker procedures can move toward specialty cardiac centers and ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). The approved estimate places hospitals at approximately 47.8% of market value in 2025, while specialty cardiac centers and ASCs are expected to grow at about 6.1% and 7.5%, respectively. This mix shift raises procedure throughput but gives lower-cost sites more purchasing leverage, favoring vendors that can pair efficient implants with training and service support.
Key Restraints
Affordability and reimbursement friction.
The high acquisition cost of transcatheter valves, combined with the investment needed for a hybrid laboratory and multidisciplinary program, keeps intervention concentrated in well-funded centers. In emerging markets, unmet clinical need can therefore coexist with low procedure penetration. The constraint is sharper for leadless pacemakers, whose clinical advantages may not offset a premium device price under fixed episode-of-care payments. Market expansion outside established centers depends on payer coverage and procurement models, rather than clinical demand alone.
Specialist capacity and evidence requirements.
Implant outcomes and program economics are linked to operator experience, especially for structural interventions. Regulatory standards also raise the cost and duration of market entry for high-risk implantables. The EU Medical Device Regulation approval for MicroPort CRM’s ALIZEA, BOREA, and CELEA systems in August 2024 illustrates the need for specific clinical and post-market evidence, even for an established therapy class. [4]MicroPort - MicroPort CRM Receives EU Medical Device Regulation Approval for ALIZEA, BOREA and CELEA Pacemakers Featuring Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, August 21, 2024 - microport.com These barriers protect incumbents with regulatory infrastructure, but they can delay new technology diffusion and constrain adoption in lower-volume geographies.
GMI Analyst View
Cardiac prosthetic devices are moving through two distinct adoption curves. Transcatheter valves are widening their treatment boundary through evidence and indication expansion, whereas pacemakers are changing their delivery architecture through leadless and conduction-system approaches. The May 2025 asymptomatic SAPIEN 3 approval is consequential because it tests whether health systems will fund earlier intervention, not merely whether clinicians can perform it. Reimbursement and referral protocols will therefore determine how much of the new eligible cohort becomes revenue.
The regional forecast supports a second conclusion: growth volume and premium pricing will not arise in the same places. North America’s USD 6,311.95 million base gives manufacturers the strongest setting for monetizing high-value structural-heart platforms, while Asia Pacific’s 6.86% CAGR makes local registration, training, and price architecture more important to long-run share. Suppliers that treat emerging markets as an extension of U.S. pricing risk losing volume; suppliers that compete only on price risk undermining the clinical-service model required for complex implants.
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Segment Analysis
By Product Type
The approximately USD 8,740 million heart-valve segment combines mature surgical technologies with the faster-growing transcatheter category. Mechanical valves retain a defined role in younger patients for whom durability can outweigh the burden of lifelong anticoagulation. Artivion’s On-X platform is differentiated by clinical evidence supporting lower-intensity anticoagulation in selected use, preserving a niche against bioprosthetic alternatives. Tissue valves remain important for surgical aortic and mitral replacement, where avoidance of long-term anticoagulation is a decisive patient consideration. Their commercial challenge is longevity: anti-calcification treatment and improved leaflet preservation are intended to extend durability and narrow the age range in which a tissue valve is preferred.
Transcatheter valves generate the segment’s principal growth because they move the intervention from open surgery toward a catheter-based pathway. Edwards’ SAPIEN franchise and Medtronic’s Evolut platform remain reference products, but new entrants are increasing choice. Meril’s LANDMARK randomized study reported non-inferiority for Myval versus comparator transcatheter valves at 30 days in 768 patients [5]PR Newswire / Meril Life Sciences - MERIL Announces Successful Primary Outcomes of Next-Gen Myval THV Series in Major RCT, May 2024 - prnewswire.com while VitaFlow Liberty’s EU approval provides a Chinese-developed alternative for European programs. The strategic contest is consequently shifting from basic proof of implantability to anatomy coverage, repositionability, coronary access, evidence breadth, and the ability to support centers through imaging and procedure planning.
TMVR remains materially less mature than TAVR. Abbott’s Tendyne received FDA approval in May 2025 for severe mitral annular calcification, making it the first approved transcatheter mitral replacement option for that U.S. indication. The limited indication should not be generalized to the broader mitral-regurgitation population, but it establishes a regulatory and commercial foothold in a difficult anatomy where surgical alternatives can be challenging.
Pacemakers.
Pacemakers, estimated at approximately USD 5,900 million in 2025, encompass implantable single-chamber, dual-chamber, and biventricular/CRT systems, plus external temporary devices. Conventional implantables remain the revenue base, particularly in dual-chamber and CRT use, but they face a different market logic from valves: procedure volumes are broad, procurement is more competitive, and product differentiation increasingly depends on lead performance, battery longevity, MRI workflow, connectivity, and remote management.
Single-chamber leadless devices remove the pocket and transvenous lead, which are major sources of conventional-system complications. Medtronic’s Micra AV received Japanese approval and launch in January 2022. Dual-chamber leadless pacing addresses a larger part of the pacemaker population: Abbott’s AVEIR DR received FDA approval in June 2023, using implant-to-implant communication to coordinate atrial and ventricular devices without a lead. The commercial implication is not an immediate replacement of all transvenous pacing. Rather, leadless adoption will be determined by patient selection, implant expertise, reimbursement, and the ability to retrieve or manage devices over a long treatment horizon.
CRT and conduction-system pacing create a parallel upgrade cycle. BIOTRONIK’s Solia S and Selectra 3D system received an FDA labeling expansion for left bundle branch area pacing in 2024, and Boston Scientific’s INGEVITY+ pacing leads received an expanded FDA indication in September 2024. These approvals support procedural standardization around physiologic pacing, but training capacity remains a practical rate limiter.
By End Use
Hospitals are the central channel for TAVR, TMVR, complex valve surgery, and high-acuity pacing because those procedures require multidisciplinary expertise and rapid escalation capability. Specialty cardiac centers can gain share where a concentrated team improves scheduling, repeatability, and referral management. ASCs are a more selective growth outlet, chiefly for appropriate pacemaker implants; their expanding role can improve access and reduce episode costs but intensifies price scrutiny. Other end users contribute primarily through temporary pacing, follow-up, and connected-monitoring activity rather than through complex implant volumes.
GMI Analyst View
Segment economics are separating the market into a high-value structural-heart expansion and a pacing portfolio redesign. TAVR is broadening the heart-valve opportunity through evidence, anatomy coverage, and less invasive delivery, while TMVR remains an early, tightly indicated option whose commercial scale will depend on solving complex anatomy and proving durable outcomes beyond the initial severe-mitral-annular-calcification foothold. In pacing, dual-chamber leadless systems and conduction-system tools alter the mix rather than eliminate transvenous systems, making implant expertise, retrieval strategy, and remote-management workflow central to adoption. Hospitals retain 47.8% of market value because they anchor complex interventions, but the 7.5% CAGR expected for ASCs shifts bargaining power in suitable pacing cases toward lower-cost settings, increasing the premium on vendor training, procedural efficiency, and service design.
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Regional Analysis
North America
North America was valued at USD 5,621.06 million in 2022, USD 6,061.00 million in 2024, and USD 6,311.95 million in 2025; it is projected to grow at 5.01% from 2026 to 2035. Its scale derives from reimbursement, extensive structural-heart infrastructure, and adoption of premium implant technologies. The U.S. component increased from USD 2,719.83 million in 2022 to USD 3,025.45 million in 2025 and has a 4.43% forecast CAGR. Canada increased from USD 2,901.23 million to USD 3,286.51 million over the same period, with a 5.53% forecast CAGR. The unusual country split in the approved model makes country-level commercial planning essential rather than assuming U.S. demand represents the full regional logic. In the U.S. the asymptomatic TAVR indication is likely to raise demand at existing high-capability programs before it broadens the number of implanting sites.
Europe
Europe rose from USD 3,477.99 million in 2022 to USD 3,940.82 million in 2025 and is forecast to grow at 5.35%. Germany, the UK, France, Spain, Italy, and the Netherlands have well-developed structural-heart pathways, but procurement and approval conditions differ. The UK’s NICOR 2024 TAVI report provides a national benchmark for procedure activity and outcomes. [6]NICOR - The 2024 TAVI Report, 2024 - nicor.org.uk Spain’s long-running TAVIDOR registry shows how greater experience and minimalist procedural practice can improve outcomes over time. EU MDR evidence requirements increase the cost of maintaining or obtaining access, which may favor manufacturers with established regulatory and clinical infrastructure while creating an opening for entrants that can demonstrate robust documentation.
Asia Pacific
Asia Pacific increased from USD 2,585.36 million in 2022 to USD 3,066.12 million in 2025 and has the fastest approved CAGR, 6.86%. China is pivotal because domestic manufacturers are coupling local registration with broader export ambitions. VitaFlow Liberty’s EU approval and South Korean approval in December 2024 show MicroPort CardioFlow’s progression beyond China [7]MicroPort - MicroPort CardioFlow’s VitaFlow Liberty Obtains Marketing Approval in South Korea, December 12, 2024 - microport.com Japan combines universal coverage with a very old population, supporting advanced pacing and valve adoption; Meril’s exclusive promotion agreement with Japan Lifeline for Myval Octacor, contingent on approval, illustrates the value of local channel expertise in that market. India has considerable need and domestic manufacturing capability, but the cost of transcatheter intervention limits broad access. Australia and South Korea provide more mature reimbursement and specialist infrastructure, making them important reference markets for new regional launches.
Latin America
Latin America advanced from USD 708.40 million in 2022 to USD 830.71 million in 2025 and is forecast to grow at 6.51%. Brazil’s ANVISA pathway and mixed public-private care system make it the region’s principal market, while Mexico’s private cardiac programs and device approvals support transcatheter expansion. Labcor Laboratórios’ Brazilian manufacturing position offers an example of how local tissue-valve supply can compete where imported devices face price and tender pressure. Argentina’s access remains more concentrated in large urban private systems. The commercial requirement across the region is an affordable portfolio and reliable distributor or hospital relationships, rather than a simple replication of North American direct-sales models.
Middle East and Africa
MEA grew from USD 423.83 million in 2022 to USD 490.18 million in 2025 and is projected to expand at 6.07%. Saudi Arabia and the UAE benefit from investment in advanced cardiac care and use of established foreign approvals as part of local market-access pathways. South Africa remains the most developed sub-Saharan setting, although access is concentrated in private urban care. These markets can support sophisticated implants at selected referral centers, but program scale will depend on specialist training, public funding, and sustained catheter-laboratory investment.
GMI Analyst View
North America remains the principal setting for premium cardiac prosthetic-device monetization because reimbursement and established structural-heart programs can absorb newly approved indications before the implant base disperses more widely. Asia Pacific’s 6.86% forecast CAGR reflects a different growth engine: hospital infrastructure, local registration, domestic manufacturers, and country-specific channel partnerships are expanding access, but pricing and training will govern whether volume converts into sustainable share. Latin America and MEA offer meaningful structural potential, yet their growth is constrained by payer capacity, concentration of specialist centers, and the capital required for catheter-based programs. The regional commercial model must therefore vary by market: evidence-led account expansion in North America, localized access and service architecture in Asia Pacific, and carefully targeted affordability and referral strategies in access-constrained regions.
Cardiac Prosthetic Devices Market Share & Competitive Landscape
The market is concentrated at the high end: the approved estimate places the top five players at approximately 72% of global value. Scale matters because valve and rhythm-management competition is built on years of pivotal-trial investment, regulatory files, physician training, service coverage, and hospital-account relationships. Yet share is not static. Asian and Indian challengers are using lower cost, domestic access, and international clinical evidence to enter specific segments, while surgical-valve specialists defend focused positions where transcatheter substitution is incomplete.
Abbott
Abbott combines structural-heart and rhythm-management assets. Its relevant differentiation includes the Tendyne TMVR approval for severe mitral annular calcification and AVEIR leadless pacing. Its ability to offer both valve and pacing technologies can strengthen account relationships, although evidence requirements and clinical adoption differ substantially between those categories.
Artivion
Artivion’s On-X mechanical valve gives it a durable niche in surgical replacement. Its value proposition rests on mechanical-valve durability and reduced-intensity anticoagulation evidence in eligible patients, rather than participation in transcatheter scale. The company’s July 2024 amendment to its Endospan agreements reinforced its aortic-disease strategy.
BIOTRONIK
BIOTRONIK competes in cardiac rhythm management through pacemakers, monitoring, and pacing tools. Amvia Edge’s 2023 FDA approval and its MRI-management features illustrate a workflow-based differentiation strategy; the 2024 left bundle branch area pacing label expansion adds relevance in physiologic pacing.
Boston Scientific
Boston Scientific brings a broad CRM base and a developing structural-heart position. Its INGEVITY+ expanded indication strengthens its conduction-system pacing offering, while ACURATE neo2 supplies a transcatheter valve option in Europe. The strategic opportunity is to use electrophysiology and hospital relationships to deepen structural-heart adoption without depending on a single therapy franchise.
Colibri Heart Valve
Colibri is a pre-commercial polymer-valve developer. Its proposed balloon-expandable polymer leaflet design targets two limitations of incumbent technologies: tissue-valve calcification and the anticoagulation burden of mechanical valves. Commercial relevance remains contingent on clinical evidence and regulatory approval; it should be viewed as longer-term technology optionality rather than current market supply.
CORCYM
CORCYM concentrates on surgical mechanical and tissue valves, including rapid-deployment platforms. Its focused surgical presence can remain relevant where anatomy, concomitant surgery, patient age, or durability requirements favor open replacement. The absence of a transcatheter portfolio, however, limits direct participation in the fastest-growing valve delivery modality.
Edwards Lifesciences
Edwards is a structural-heart leader with the SAPIEN valve family and surgical RESILIA-tissue platforms. FDA approval for asymptomatic severe aortic stenosis materially strengthens its indication-led growth route. Its competitive challenge is to preserve procedural loyalty as Medtronic and newer transcatheter systems expand operator choice.
Labcor Laboratórios
Labcor is a Brazilian bioprosthesis manufacturer serving surgical-valve demand in Brazil and other markets. Local manufacturing and regional clinical familiarity can be advantages in tenders and cost-sensitive procurement, although the company faces the long-term substitution pressure of transcatheter therapy at advanced centers.
Lepu Medical
Lepu Medical participates in China’s broader cardiovascular-device ecosystem, including cardiac rhythm management and valve-related activity. Its relevance is strongest in cost-sensitive Asian markets, where local manufacturing, registration, and pricing can offset the commercial advantage of multinational portfolios.
Medtronic
Medtronic spans Evolut transcatheter valves, surgical tissue valves, and the Micra leadless pacemaker franchise. Mosaic Neo received FDA approval and was launched in the United States in April 2026. [8]Medtronic - New Medtronic Mosaic Neo Mitral Bioprosthesis Sees Rapid Adoption Following FDA Approval, April 29, 2026 - news.medtronic.com The breadth of its portfolio allows cross-category hospital engagement, while Evolut and Micra position it directly against the principal high-growth valve and leadless-pacing transitions.
Meril Life Sciences
Meril’s Myval platform has gained credibility through the LANDMARK randomized evidence base. Its agreement with Japan Lifeline demonstrates a partnership-led model for regulated markets. Competitive success will depend on converting clinical non-inferiority into approvals, implanting-center confidence, and a service model capable of competing with established TAVR suppliers.
MicroPort
MicroPort operates through CRM and CardioFlow businesses. Alizea and Celea supply a pacing platform with compact form factor and long projected longevity, while VitaFlow Liberty gives the company a retrievable TAVI system with EU and South Korean approvals. The dual presence creates a broader platform than that of most Chinese-origin competitors.
Pacetronix
Pacetronix focuses on implantable pacing systems for cost-sensitive markets. Its opportunity is tied to access gaps where premium multinational pricing restricts conventional pacemaker penetration. Sustained competitiveness will depend on regulatory documentation, distributor quality, and reliability performance rather than on scale alone.
Venus Medtech
Venus Medtech focuses on structural heart disease and has expanded its VenusA and VenusP-Valve footprint internationally. In 2024, the company reported VenusP-Valve approvals in additional markets and continued expansion of its structural-heart portfolio. Its challenge is to translate broad geographic approvals into trained implanting centers and repeatable commercial adoption.
Recent Industry Developments
Need a specific section of this report?
Purchase regional analysis, country-level analysis, company profiles, or any other segment-level insights separately
based on your research needs.
Frequently Asked Question(FAQ) :
Research methodology, data sources & validation process
This report draws on a structured research process built around direct industry conversations, proprietary modelling, and rigorous cross-validation and not just desk research.
Our 6-step research process
1. Research design & analyst oversight
At GMI, our research methodology is built on a foundation of human expertise, rigorous validation, and complete transparency. Every insight, trend analysis, and forecast in our reports is developed by experienced analysts who understand the nuances of your market.
Our approach integrates extensive primary research through direct engagement with industry participants and experts, complemented by comprehensive secondary research from verified global sources. We apply quantified impact analysis to deliver dependable forecasts, while maintaining complete traceability from original data sources to final insights.
2. Primary research
Primary research forms the backbone of our methodology, contributing nearly 80% to overall insights. It involves direct engagement with industry participants to ensure accuracy and depth in analysis. Our structured interview program covers regional and global markets, with inputs from C-suite executives, directors, and subject matter experts. These interactions provide strategic, operational, and technical perspectives, enabling well-rounded insights and reliable market forecasts.
3. Data mining & market analysis
Data mining is a key part of our research process, contributing nearly 20% to the overall methodology. It involves analysing market structure, identifying industry trends, and assessing macroeconomic factors through revenue share analysis of major players. Relevant data is collected from both paid and unpaid sources to build a reliable database. This information is then integrated to support primary research and market sizing, with validation from key stakeholders such as distributors, manufacturers, and associations.
4. Market sizing
Our market sizing is built on a bottom-up approach, starting with company revenue data gathered directly through primary interviews, alongside production volume figures from manufacturers and installation or deployment statistics. These inputs are then pieced together across regional markets to arrive at a global estimate that stays grounded in actual industry activity.
5. Forecast model & key assumptions
Every forecast includes explicit documentation of:
✓ Key growth drivers and their assumed impact
✓ Restraining factors and mitigation scenarios
✓ Regulatory assumptions and policy change risk
✓ Technology adoption curve parameter
✓ Macroeconomic assumptions (GDP growth, inflation, currency)
✓ Competitive dynamics and market entry/exit expectations
6. Validation & quality assurance
The final stages involve human validation, where domain experts manually review filtered data to identify nuances and contextual errors that automated systems might miss. This expert review adds a critical layer of quality assurance, ensuring data aligns with research objectives and domain-specific standards.
Our triple-layer validation process ensures maximum data reliability:
✓ Statistical Validation
✓ Expert Validation
✓ Market Reality Check
Trust & credibility
Verified data sources
Trade publications
Industry journals, trade publications, and specialized media.
Industry databases
Proprietary and third-party market databases
Regulatory filings
Government procurement records and policy documents
Academic research
University studies and specialist institution reports
Company reports
Annual reports, investor presentations, and filings
Expert interviews
C-suite, procurement leads, and technical specialists
GMI archive
13,000+ published studies across 20+ industry verticals
Trade data
Import/export volumes, HS codes, and customs records
Parameters studied & evaluated
Every data point in this report is validated through primary interviews, true bottom-up modelling, and rigorous cross-checks. Read about our research process →